A filing cabinet in a valley, with a record unspooling toward the river.
Custody LedgerExhibits 02–10Illustration · not a record

  1. Ex. 02Copy

    Follow the routing, not the rumor. A routing note is not a verified transaction.

  2. Ex. 03Copy

    A mention in correspondence is not a resolved record.

  3. Ex. 04Copy

    Place names repeat. Fact patterns stay in separate files.

  4. Ex. 05Copy

    One question can have more than one custodian.

  5. Ex. 06Copy

    Match the claim to the source. A mention is not a verdict.

  6. Ex. 07Copy

    Redact only what the law requires, and say what was withheld.

  7. Ex. 08Copy

    Release what the law allows. Say what it withholds.

  8. Ex. 09Copy

    A sourced page corrects a rumor. Distinctions stay on the page.

  9. Ex. 10Copy

    Who holds it, what can be released, and what is withheld.

Wire · @altmilknews · not a filing

Asks the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney General to release what they have. · Asks where a government response is, and tags the U.S. Marshals, the U.S. Attorney, and Missoula. · Posts a sourced note on EFTA01526966: a July 2007 JPMorgan Fedwire debit, described as via WEST SEC MISSOULA to Ideal Manufacturing, memo about a batch plant. · Asks the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney General to release what they have. · Asks where a government response is, and tags the U.S. Marshals, the U.S. Attorney, and Missoula. · Posts a sourced note on EFTA01526966: a July 2007 JPMorgan Fedwire debit, described as via WEST SEC MISSOULA to Ideal Manufacturing, memo about a batch plant.

Desk up. Public posts compiled. Compiled 2026-10-14. The private fleet is not on this network. No packet sent.

Open the tape · three posts, none of them a filing

  • Asks the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney General to release what they have.

    A demand on X. Not a record produced, and not a finding that either office is withholding a named file.

    Open the post

  • Asks where a government response is, and tags the U.S. Marshals, the U.S. Attorney, and Missoula.

    A question. Tagging an office is not proof the office has a file, and not proof it has answered.

    Open the post

  • Posts a sourced note on EFTA01526966: a July 2007 JPMorgan Fedwire debit, described as via WEST SEC MISSOULA to Ideal Manufacturing, memo about a batch plant.

    The post itself says this is not a Montana account, not delivery in Montana, and not knowledge of a crime. The desk has not re-opened the DOJ page image.

    Open the post

Arming rings this page at once, then again when a later check carries a different newest post. A post is still not a filing.

File copyPublicNot a roster

Docket

What is already on paper

7 files in this cut. Compiled October 14, 2026. Saving a file keeps it on this browser only.

Civil claim · Civil case open

Redfern v. Leichty — civil investigative demand

Missoula County District Court, Department of Judge Leslie Halligan · Missoula

Filed June 12, 2026

What was published

A public case index lists Samuel Pascal Redfern, the Montana Veterans Association, and the Montana Veterans Association Foundation as plaintiffs against Marti Leichty, Brent Mead, and the Montana Department of Justice Office of Consumer Protection. The visible docket entry is a petition to extend the return date or to dismiss a civil investigative demand, citing MCA 30-14-113(2), “good cause, violations and medical leave.” It was filed by Redfern on June 12, 2026. The same day the judge assignment was changed manually because of companion cases, to Judge Leslie Halligan. The public case URL carries the number DV-32-2026-0000664. The index’s own table hides that number behind a subscription, and it was last refreshed June 16, 2026.

Where it stands

This is a state civil filing about a consumer-protection investigative demand. It is not a federal civil-rights complaint, and the visible docket line does not say what the state is investigating.

Does not establish

Companion cases are noted and not opened here. Do not treat the petition as a ruling. Do not invent a PACER number for it. There isn’t one: this court is Missoula County, not the District of Montana.

Sources