A filing cabinet in a valley, with a record unspooling toward the river.
Custody LedgerExhibits 02–10Illustration · not a record
  1. Ex. 02Copy

    Follow the routing, not the rumor. A routing note is not a verified transaction.

  2. Ex. 03Copy

    A mention in correspondence is not a resolved record.

  3. Ex. 04Copy

    Place names repeat. Fact patterns stay in separate files.

  4. Ex. 05Copy

    One question can have more than one custodian.

  5. Ex. 06Copy

    Match the claim to the source. A mention is not a verdict.

  6. Ex. 07Copy

    Redact only what the law requires, and say what was withheld.

  7. Ex. 08Copy

    Release what the law allows. Say what it withholds.

  8. Ex. 09Copy

    A sourced page corrects a rumor. Distinctions stay on the page.

  9. Ex. 10Copy

    Who holds it, what can be released, and what is withheld.

Wire · @altmilknews · not a filing

Asks the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney General to release what they have. · Asks where a government response is, and tags the U.S. Marshals, the U.S. Attorney, and Missoula. · Posts a sourced note on EFTA01526966: a July 2007 JPMorgan Fedwire debit, described as via WEST SEC MISSOULA to Ideal Manufacturing, memo about a batch plant. · Asks the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney General to release what they have. · Asks where a government response is, and tags the U.S. Marshals, the U.S. Attorney, and Missoula. · Posts a sourced note on EFTA01526966: a July 2007 JPMorgan Fedwire debit, described as via WEST SEC MISSOULA to Ideal Manufacturing, memo about a batch plant.

Desk up. Public posts compiled. Compiled 2026-10-14. The private fleet is not on this network. No packet sent.

Open the tape · three posts, none of them a filing
  • Asks the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney General to release what they have.

    A demand on X. Not a record produced, and not a finding that either office is withholding a named file.

    Open the post
  • Asks where a government response is, and tags the U.S. Marshals, the U.S. Attorney, and Missoula.

    A question. Tagging an office is not proof the office has a file, and not proof it has answered.

    Open the post
  • Posts a sourced note on EFTA01526966: a July 2007 JPMorgan Fedwire debit, described as via WEST SEC MISSOULA to Ideal Manufacturing, memo about a batch plant.

    The post itself says this is not a Montana account, not delivery in Montana, and not knowledge of a crime. The desk has not re-opened the DOJ page image.

    Open the post

Arming rings this page at once, then again when a later check carries a different newest post. A post is still not a filing.

File copyPublicNot a roster

Docket

What is already on paper

7 files in this cut. Compiled October 14, 2026. Saving a file keeps it on this browser only.

Federal docket · On a public docket

Lighthiser v. Trump

No. 2:25-cv-00054 · Federal — District of Montana

Filed May 29, 2025; dismissal reported October 2025

What was published

Young plaintiffs, including Livingston resident Eva Lighthiser and youths who had won the state-court Held climate trial, sued President Donald J. Trump and federal offices over executive orders they said would worsen climate change and violate their constitutional rights. Montana intervened on the government’s side. Judge Dana Christensen dismissed the case. The Bozeman Daily Chronicle reported that he found overwhelming evidence the plaintiffs were being harmed, and would be harmed further, but called an order blocking the executive actions unworkable. He wrote that the claim belonged with the political branches or the electorate. The plaintiffs said they would appeal.

Where it stands

Dismissed in the district court. An appeal was announced by the plaintiffs. That announcement is not a Ninth Circuit case number in this file.

Does not establish

A constitutional suit by young people is political dissent in the public-records sense. It is not a criminal case, and the dismissal is not a finding that the climate facts were false. The Chronicle is the source for the judge’s reasoning quoted here.

Sources