A filing cabinet in a valley, with a record unspooling toward the river.
Custody LedgerExhibits 02–10Illustration · not a record

  1. Ex. 02Copy

    Follow the routing, not the rumor. A routing note is not a verified transaction.

  2. Ex. 03Copy

    A mention in correspondence is not a resolved record.

  3. Ex. 04Copy

    Place names repeat. Fact patterns stay in separate files.

  4. Ex. 05Copy

    One question can have more than one custodian.

  5. Ex. 06Copy

    Match the claim to the source. A mention is not a verdict.

  6. Ex. 07Copy

    Redact only what the law requires, and say what was withheld.

  7. Ex. 08Copy

    Release what the law allows. Say what it withholds.

  8. Ex. 09Copy

    A sourced page corrects a rumor. Distinctions stay on the page.

  9. Ex. 10Copy

    Who holds it, what can be released, and what is withheld.

Wire · @altmilknews · not a filing

Asks the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney General to release what they have. · Asks where a government response is, and tags the U.S. Marshals, the U.S. Attorney, and Missoula. · Posts a sourced note on EFTA01526966: a July 2007 JPMorgan Fedwire debit, described as via WEST SEC MISSOULA to Ideal Manufacturing, memo about a batch plant. · Asks the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney General to release what they have. · Asks where a government response is, and tags the U.S. Marshals, the U.S. Attorney, and Missoula. · Posts a sourced note on EFTA01526966: a July 2007 JPMorgan Fedwire debit, described as via WEST SEC MISSOULA to Ideal Manufacturing, memo about a batch plant.

Desk up. Public posts compiled. Compiled 2026-10-14. The private fleet is not on this network. No packet sent.

Open the tape · three posts, none of them a filing

  • Asks the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney General to release what they have.

    A demand on X. Not a record produced, and not a finding that either office is withholding a named file.

    Open the post

  • Asks where a government response is, and tags the U.S. Marshals, the U.S. Attorney, and Missoula.

    A question. Tagging an office is not proof the office has a file, and not proof it has answered.

    Open the post

  • Posts a sourced note on EFTA01526966: a July 2007 JPMorgan Fedwire debit, described as via WEST SEC MISSOULA to Ideal Manufacturing, memo about a batch plant.

    The post itself says this is not a Montana account, not delivery in Montana, and not knowledge of a crime. The desk has not re-opened the DOJ page image.

    Open the post

Arming rings this page at once, then again when a later check carries a different newest post. A post is still not a filing.

File copyPublicNot a roster

Docket

What is already on paper

7 files in this cut. Compiled October 14, 2026. Saving a file keeps it on this browser only.

Federal docket · On a public docket

Imperial Sovereign Court v. Knudsen

No. 2:23-cv-00050-BMM; appeal No. 23-3581 · Federal — District of Montana

Filed 2023; Ninth Circuit opinion March 13, 2026

What was published

Performers, teachers, businesses, and nonprofits sued to stop Montana House Bill 359 before it was enforced. The bill restricts what it calls drag story hours and sexually oriented performances, with criminal and civil penalties. Plaintiffs say the law violates the First Amendment and due process, on its face and as applied. Defendants are Attorney General Austin Knudsen and the Superintendent of Public Instruction, then Elsie Arntzen. Chief District Judge Brian M. Morris issued a preliminary injunction. The Ninth Circuit affirmed it on March 13, 2026. The opinion says the injunction bars the defendants from instituting, maintaining, or prosecuting enforcement proceedings under the bill.

Where it stands

A published appellate opinion, not a final judgment on the whole case. The injunction stands as of that opinion. Speech about gender presentation is treated, in this lawsuit, as political and expressive speech.

Does not establish

This is not a list of every plaintiff, and it is not a ruling that every performance is protected. Read the opinion before quoting a holding past the injunction. The people in the caption are litigants, not suspects.

Sources